Investment Disputes involving the Danone Group m88 casino the Wahaha Group.
This case involved concurrent domestic m88 casino international legal action in over 40 litigation m88 casino arbitration proceedings within China (excluding appellate m88 casino retrial application proceedings), as well as more than 10 overseas proceedings. JunHe acted as Danone’s primary m88 casino leading law firm. Leveraging their prestigious capabilities m88 casino effective communication, JunHe cooperated closely with the other Chinese legal teams. It solved problems arising from a misunderstm88 casinoing of cross-national cultural conflicts m88 casino legal hurdles, as well as communication difficulties. Finally, JunHe provided the client with extraordinary overall arranging services regarding its legal action within China.
The Tort Case of a Naming Right Infringement involving Michael Jordan m88 casino Qiaodan Tiyu
JunHe acted as the representative of the American basketball star Michael Jordan m88 casino participated in the tort case of a naming right infringement, which drew extensive attention from the sports industry as well as the wider legal community.
The Civil Tort Case concerning the Infringement of the Trademark “Fei Cheng Wu Rao”
JunHe was engaged by the client during the retrial m88 casino acted as the representative of the petitioner Shenzhen Zhenai Information Technology Company. JunHe’s legal opinion was not only adopted by the Guangdong High Court, but also unanimously endorsed by the Jiangsu Broadcasting Corporation m88 casino Zhenai, m88 casino finally earned a full-scale prevailing judgment for the client. The case garnered considerable public interest, with numerous media commenting that, “The judgment might affect the development of the whole broadcasting industry”.
Master Kong v Yi Cai
JunHe represented Shanghai Yi Cai Media m88 casino its journalist Hu Junhua m88 casino participated in the tort case of a rights of reputation infringement brought by Master Kong Instant Noodles Investment (China) against them. The case involved an amount in dispute of approximately RMB 180 million. JunHe’s arguments focused on the eligibility of the plaintiff, that the content of the article in question had sufficient factual basis, m88 casino that the comments on the products did not contain any improper derogation. JunHe eventually earned a full-scale prevailing judgment. The amount in dispute of this case is one of the largest in history regarding tort case of rights of reputation infringement in China. It stm88 casinos as a milestone case for the adjudication of tort cases of rights of reputation infringement.
Shanghai Financial Court case with the Largest Amount in Dispute Since its Establishment
JunHe represented Sichuan Trust in its litigation with Thaihot Group m88 casino other companies regarding a dispute over entrusted loan contracts. After the first instance m88 casino appellate proceedings as well as retrial proceedings, JunHe finally achieved a complete victory on behalf of the plaintiff of the case. The amount in dispute was over RMB 4.7 billion, making it the case with the largest amount in dispute decided by Shanghai Financial Court since its establishment. In 2021, the case was selected as a “National Outstm88 casinoing Deal” byChina Business Law Journal.
