2019.10.24
m88 casino review Hong Kong subsidiary of a US manufacturer of a well-known brand (“US Brand Company” or m88 casino review “client”) had a dispute with a Hong Kong company over unjust enrichment, as funds of m88 casino review US Brand Company were erroneously transferred into m88 casino review bank account of m88 casino review Hong Kong company through a bank in Shenzhen. m88 casino review US Brand Company brought a lawsuit against m88 casino review Hong Kong company before m88 casino review People’s Court of Qianhai District, Shenzhen, demanding for m88 casino review return of m88 casino review funds that were erroneously transferred. JunHe represented m88 casino review US Brand Company in m88 casino review trial of first instance, which it won on October 15, 2019 (date of judgment).
and
This is a model case for unjust enrichment disputes and is instructive for future practice as it provides a creative solution for this type of case. m88 casino review team’s legal performance, high responsibility, and quality and efficient legal services were well acknowledged by m88 casino review client.
m88 casino review case was led by Partnersm88 casino bonus code ,专业领域,争议解决,劳动法,破产重整与清算from Shenzhen office,M88 game APK 专业人员,文章发布,君合法评 and m88 casino app ,是中国律师行业参与发起设立的第一支碳中和专项基金from Hong Kong office, andfrom Shanghai.